`


THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH
read:
MALAYSIA Tanah Tumpah Darahku

LOVE MALAYSIA!!!


 


Friday, December 12, 2014

Does PAS really know what is best for Malaysia?

PAS wants to meet with the 25 eminent Malays but does PAS understand how Islam can co-exist in a multi-religious nation like Malaysia?
COMMENT
by TK Chua
pas moderate2The open letter by 25 eminent Malays has elicited many responses from political parties and individuals.
PAS has come up with a series of responses, ranging from Islam being misunderstood to how and why the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) must be adapted by religion, ethics and local culture to ensure no corrosion of religious tenets which may invite moral decay within a society.
I however can’t help but feel that all this is baloney.
Before the open letter, did PAS say anything about the abuse of religion by certain quarters to incite and provoke ill-will and discontentment? I must say the incitement has gone on for months and years now, but nothing much was done by PAS to stop it.
On the contrary, the records show that PAS has become even more narrow-minded and obsessed with its hudud laws and other forms of bigotries which has rattled to whole country.
Now PAS want to engage with the eminent 25 but according to its information chief, the dialogue must be based on “Islamic principles” and the “rejuvenated role and practice of the Islamic religious bodies” in the country.
This is really something. Does PAS have clear and acceptable Islamic principles? Does PAS have a clear notion of what constitutes the rejuvenated role and practice of the Islamic religious bodies? To quell misunderstanding about Islam, does PAS have a clear understanding of what Islam should be in order to be in a multi-racial and multi-religious society like Malaysia?
Then I look at the statement by PAS’ Kuala Nerus MP Khairuddin Aman Razali. According to him, Islam backs the protection of human rights but it “must be interpreted in the context of religious teachings and local cultures”. Human rights issues must be “seen alongside religion, ethics and culture, and must be in line with Islamic teachings and the federal constitution”.
Seriously, I see lots of problems in this statement too. Was he saying the current Universal Declaration of Human Rights is not based on any religious values, ethics or culture at all? If it is a universal declaration, why must it be accepted only with modification and adaptation to Malaysia?
Also, when he said human rights must be in line with Islamic teachings, I hope his interpretation of Islamic teachings is clear and acceptable by others. Some have already claimed that Islam and Sharia are not bound by the Federal Constitution. So what exactly was he talking about when he said human rights issues must be in line with Islamic teachings and the federal constitution?
We are discussing serious matters here. So please don’t be vague or ambiguous just to gain brownie points. If a religion is interpreted parochially, dogmatically, and uncompromisingly, it does not matter if it has come from ISMA, Perkasa or PAS.
I see no future in PAS remaining in Pakatan Rakyat unless the party is willing to accept secularism, parliamentary democracy and liberalism (yes, liberalism and moderation no matter how much ISMA and Perkasa have detested it) as the coalition’s core principles.
This country is innately built on secularism, progressiveness and liberalism. Any distraction is a waste time and energy.
TK Chua is an FMT reader

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.